FWSIM AND COPYRIGHT LAWS ON YOUTUBE DRIVER
FWSIM AND COPYRIGHT LAWS ON YOUTUBE SERIES

YouTube even provides a convenient web form for the report. Essentially, a copyright owner can submit to YouTube a claim that infringing content is on the site and ask YouTube to remove the offending video.

In the U.S., YouTube strictly follows the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notice and takedown procedures. But this technology is not infallible, as shown in January, and mistakes damage not only content ownersвЂ™ income but also the communityвЂ™s trust in YouTubeвЂ™s application of copyright law. YouTube is planning to roll out a similar but more limited Copyright Match Tool in the near future to allow additional users to police their own content. those with large libraries of exclusive copyrighted content like music publishing companies) to have YouTube scan every upload to the site for comparison with their copyrighted library and automatically take action. As shown in just two weeksвЂ™ worth of missteps, YouTubeвЂ™s system for resolving copyright disputes remains ripe for abuse, even with automated technology like ContentID in place. The primary consequence of being on the wrong end of a copyright complaint is the loss of that ad money, either by having the offending video removed or by YouTube redirecting the revenue to the copyright holder. For example, one revenue estimator shows that a video with 20,000 views per day could make $30 per day the creator of that Star Wars video, with 240,000 views per day in its first month and 1.6 million subscribers to his channel, could have made over $5,000 per day had he run ads with it. YouTube takes a 45% cut of the revenue the content creator gets the rest. The revenue of that ad is based on how much advertisers are willing to pay numerous factors including the number of views, how many viewers watch the ad, the genre of the content, and the subscriber base of the creator. YouTube creators with a sufficient following can use GoogleвЂ™s AdSense to get paid for running ads at the beginning of their videos. YouTube videos can be immensely lucrative, not only for YouTube but also for the video creators who share in that revenue stream. Similar stories about a dashcam compilation channel and several video game streaming channels rounded out the week.ДЄll of these incidents have two things in common: money, specifically the ad revenue generated from the videos and nominally destined for the creators, and YouTubeвЂ™s handling of copyright disputes.

FWSIM AND COPYRIGHT LAWS ON YOUTUBE SERIES

The very next day a series of K-pop music videos were temporarily removed from YouTube following an improper takedown request based on allegedly false copyright claims. Then the following week a fan-made Star Wars movie, ostensibly created with permission from Disney subsidiary Lucasfilm, received a copyright claim against a portion of its soundtrack. Instead, false, mistaken, or otherwise improper claims of infringement threatened several YouTube channels.ДЇirst came a report that YouTubeвЂ™s automated Content ID audio rights service made a copyright claim against a userвЂ™s own voice.

FWSIM AND COPYRIGHT LAWS ON YOUTUBE DRIVER

The driver of the controversy was that actual copyright infringement had not occurred. In January, a spate of copyright-related conflicts between content creators and purported rights-holders grabbed headlines across the Internet, causing a few minor dustups in related communities on Reddit.

The new year started with an old problem for the vaunted video platform YouTube.

Fwsim and copyright laws on youtube